Effects on temporomandibular disorder in the treatment of tension-type headache with acupuncture and therapeutic exercises. A secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of acupuncture and therapeutic exercise alone and in combination on temporomandibular joint symptoms in tension-type headache and to evaluate the potential interaction of existing temporomandibular dysfunction on the success of headache treatment. DESIGN: Pre-planned secondary analysis of a randomized controlled, non-blinded trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinic of a German university hospital. SUBJECTS: Ninety-six Participants with frequent episodic or chronic tension-type headache were randomized to one of four treatment groups. INTERVENTIONS: Six weeks of acupuncture or therapeutic exercise either as monotherapies or in combination, or usual care. Follow-up at 3 and 6 months. MAIN MEASURES: Subjective temporomandibular dysfunction symptoms were measured using the Functional Questionnaire Masticatory Organ, and the influence of this sum score and objective initial dental examination on the efficacy of headache treatment interventions was analyzed. RESULTS: Temporomandibular dysfunction score improved in all intervention groups at 3-month follow-up (usual care: 0.05 [SD 1.435]; acupuncture: -5 [SD 1.436]; therapeutic exercise: -4 [SD 1.798]; combination: -3 [SD 1.504]; P = 0.03). After 6 months, only acupuncture (-6 [SD 1.736]) showed a significant improvement compared to the usual care group (P < 0.01). Subjective temporomandibular dysfunction symptoms had no overall influence on headache treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Only acupuncture had long-lasting positive effects on the symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction. Significant dental findings seem to inhibit the efficacy of acupuncture for tension-type headache.

Ageing, functioning patterns and their environmental determinants in the spinal cord injury (SCI) population: A comparative analysis across eleven European countries implementing the International Spinal Cord Injury Community Survey.

BACKGROUND: As the European population with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) is expected to become older, a better understanding of ageing with SCI using functioning, the health indicator used to model healthy ageing trajectories, is needed. We aimed to describe patterns of functioning in SCI by chronological age, age at injury and time since injury across eleven European countries using a common functioning metric, and to identify country-specific environmental determinants of functioning. METHODS: Data from 6'635 participants of the International Spinal Cord Injury Community Survey was used. The hierarchical version of Generalized Partial Credit Model, casted in a Bayesian framework, was used to create a common functioning metric and overall scores. For each country, linear regression was used to investigate associations between functioning, chronological age, age at SCI or time since injury for persons with para- and tetraplegia. Multiple linear regression and the proportional marginal variance decomposition technique were used to identify environmental determinants. RESULTS: In countries with representative samples older chronological age was consistently associated with a decline in functioning for paraplegia but not for tetraplegia. Age at injury and functioning level were associated, but patterns differed across countries. An association between time since injury and functioning was not observed in most countries, neither for paraplegia nor for tetraplegia. Problems with the accessibility of homes of friends and relatives, access to public places and long-distance transportation were consistently key determinants of functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Functioning is a key health indicator and the fundament of ageing research. Enhancing methods traditionally used to develop metrics with Bayesian approach, we were able to create a common metric of functioning with cardinal properties and to estimate overall scores comparable across countries. Focusing on functioning, our study complements epidemiological evidence on SCI-specific mortality and morbidity in Europe and identify initial targets for evidence-informed policy-making.

Socioeconomic Status, the Countries' Socioeconomic Development and Mental Health: Observational Evidence for Persons with Spinal Cord Injury from 22 Countries.

Objectives: Evidence on social inequalities in mental health of persons with physical impairments is limited. We therefore investigate associations of individual-level socioeconomic status (SES) and the country-level socioeconomic development (SED) with mental health in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: We analyzed data from 12,588 participants of the International SCI Community Survey from 22 countries. To investigate individual-level inequalities, SES indicators (education, income, financial hardship, subjective status) were regressed on the SF-36 mental health index (MHI-5), stratified by countries. Country-level inequalities were analyzed with empirical Bayes estimates of random intercepts derived from linear mixed-models adjusting for individual-level SES. Results: Financial hardship and subjective status consistently predicted individual-level mental health inequalities. Country-level SED was inconsistently related to mental health when adjusting for individual-level SES. It however appeared that higher SED was associated with better mental health within higher-resourced countries. Conclusion: Reducing impoverishment and marginalization may present valuable strategies to reduce mental health inequalities in SCI populations. Investigations of country-level determinants of mental health in persons with SCI should consider influences beyond country-level SED, such as cultural factors.

Which factors have an association to the Quality of Life (QoL) of people with acquired Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)? A cross-sectional explorative observational study.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional explorative observational study. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors which have an association to the self-perceived Quality of Life (QoL) for persons with acquired spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Eight specialized SCI-centers in Germany. The GerSCI survey is the German part of the International Spinal Cord Injury Survey (InSCI). METHODS: Self-disclosure questionnaire, created from the InSCI group, translated and adapted for Germany. The questionnaire collects a very broad range of data and, and due to its design as a self-report, is particularly suitable for the analysis on QoL. Because of the content, which is binding for all participating states, it allows a direct comparability of the results. Included in Germany were 1479 persons with acquired SCI aged 18 years and older. RESULTS: Various factors were identified with high associations to QoL, including changeable and unchangeable ones, such as those of particular importance: pain, sleep problems, sexual dysfunction, age, and time since onset of SCI. Some results confirmed reports of previous studies, others were surprising. CONCLUSION: this study provides an important basis for the planned analysis of the InSCI participating countries in the 6 WHO regions. Germany was able to contribute the largest study population. The concrete study design of InSCI allows us to directly compare data and helps us to improve ourselves within the framework of a "learning health system". Medical measures can be orientated towards the found results, in order to ensure the best possible care and support by the therapeutic team, individually adapted to the person, place of residence and impairment.

Assessment of rehabilitation needs in patients after COVID-19: Development of the COVID-19-rehabilitation needs survey.

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 can result in a broad spectrum of dysfunctions, some of which may persist for long periods, requiring long-term rehabilitation. A comprehensive screening tool is therefore necessary to identify these needs. To date, no data exist on satisfaction with medical and therapeutic interventions for COVID-19 in terms of quality and quantity. The aim of this study is to develop a survey for use with COVID-19 patients during and after the end of the acute phase of the disease. METHODS: Following the definition of dimensions by a group of experts, and a literature search, proven survey instruments were searched for suitable items. In addition, specific questions were developed based on symptoms, and answer options were created with regard to to the complexity of the questions. RESULTS: The COVID-19 Rehabilitation Needs Survey (C19-RehabNeS) consists of the established 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36) together with the newly developed COVID-19-Rehabilitation Needs Questionnaire (C19-RehabNeQ) (11 further dimensions, respectively 57 items). CONCLUSION: C19-RehabNeS is a comprehensive survey to assess functional limitations and rehabilitation needs during and after infection with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). The strength of this survey is that it combines the assessment of important rehabilitation needs with assessment of satisfaction with the health services, treatment and therapy during the pandemic (C19-RehabNeQ) and assessment of patients' quality of life (SF-36). The C19-RehabNeS survey also enables collection of systematic information on patients with Post-COVID-19 syndrome (Long-COVID-19).

Promoting factors and barriers to participation in working life for people with spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND: It is still difficult for people with physical impairments to be and remain equally integrated into the labour market. For this reason, the question of occupational activity has explicitly been examined by the German Spinal Cord Injury Survey (GerSCI) in order to identify barriers and facilitators for labour market participation. METHODS: Cross-sectional explorative observational study. The GerSCI survey is the German part of the International Spinal Cord Injury Survey (InSCI). Using survey data from persons recruited at eight specialised SCI-centres in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 1.479 persons with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) aged 18 years and older. RESULTS: In a self-disclosure questionnaire, persons with SCI show themselves as a professionally well-educated and highly motivated group with most of them aiming at gainful employment and considering themselves fit for work. Many changeable and non-changeable factors have been found, which showed a high correlation with the return to work after acquired SCI. CONCLUSION: Education and pain belong to the most critical factors and thereby possible approaches to increase the level of employment, which is essential and highly relevant not only for earning money but also for self-confidence and social integration. SCI has many dimensions in itself; support also should be multidimensional. Study results might help to improve participation.

Perceived environmental barriers for people with spinal cord injury in Germany and their influence on quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: The German Spinal Cord Injury Survey is part of the International Spinal Cord Injury Survey, which aims to collect data about the life experience of persons with spinal cord injury worldwide. This paper reports on the perceived environmental barriers of the German study population and their associations with quality of life. DESIGN: Cross-sectional explorative observational study using survey data. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,479 persons with spinal cord injury aged 18 years and older. METHODS: After descriptive analyses, exploratory factor analysis was used to build groups of environmental barriers. Logistic regressions were performed to assess correlates of perceived environmental barriers. Spearman's correlations were used to analyse the association between perceived barriers and quality of life. RESULTS: Barriers regarding infrastructure had a relatively large impact. Barriers in relation to people's attitudes towards spinal cord injury and the equipment of people with spinal cord injury had a relatively small impact on the lives of people with spinal cord injury. Several subpopulations showed a higher risk in experiencing barriers. Quality of life decreased with increasing experience of barriers. CONCLUSION: The most life-hardening barriers were identified related to infrastructure, a category in which most barriers are modifiable, for example, buildings or transportation.

Environmental Barriers Experienced by People With Spinal Cord Injury Across 22 Countries: Results From a Cross-Sectional Survey.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the experience of environmental barriers by people with spinal cord injury (SCI) across 22 countries. Specific aims were to describe and compare the prevalence of environmental barriers experienced across countries, and to analyze determinants of environmental barriers at individual and country level. DESIGN: Cross-sectional community survey. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=12,591) living with SCI in the community. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Nottwil Environmental Factors Inventory-Short Form. RESULTS: Most barriers were experienced in relation to accessibility, climate, transportation, finances, and state services. More severe barriers were experienced in settings with lower gross domestic product (GDP), which especially refers to medical supplies (gamma=-0.38; P<.001) and finances (gamma=-0.37; P<.001) in this study. However, in a multivariable negative binomial regression using within-between estimation of the number of barriers experienced on the selected predictors, the effect of GDP was reversed when it was adjusted for covariates. On the individual level, the number of experienced barriers decreased with better mental health and greater self-care ability. People with low income, with paraplegia, complete lesions, and more health problems reported more barriers. On the country level, fewer barriers were reported in countries with higher average age, better mental health, and greater self-care ability, as well as in those with a higher percentage of traumatic SCI, paraplegia, and complete lesions. More barriers were reported in countries with a higher percentage of married individuals, lower average household income, higher average time since injury, higher mean vitality scores, and greater income inequality. CONCLUSIONS: Study participants reported a significant number of environmental barriers, many of which are modifiable. Complementary interventions are recommended. Within and between country effects of covariates sometimes pointed in different directions, suggesting that countries with a different composition of SCI population also differed in environmental contexts.

Utilization of Outpatient Physical and Occupational Therapy in People With Spinal Cord Injury in Germany: Results of the German Spinal Cord Injury Survey.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess factors determining the utilization of physical and occupational therapy in people with spinal cord injury. DESIGN: Data from the German Spinal Cord Injury study conducted in 2017 were analyzed. The 12-mo prevalence of physical therapy and occupational therapy utilization was determined. To identify underlying determinants, multivariable logistic regression was used. RESULTS: Of 1479 participants (response = 26.4%), 72.9% were male, with a mean (SD) age of 55.3 (14.6) yrs and a mean (SD) time since injury of 14.0 (12.0) yrs; 51.2% were people with paraplegia and 66.3% had an incomplete spinal cord injury. In the past 12 mos, 78.1% received physical and 29.3% occupational therapy. Physical therapy and occupational therapy were significantly associated with time since spinal cord injury occurrence, participation in lifelong care programs, and electric wheelchair dependency. Spinal cord injury characteristics, level of impairment, and time since spinal cord injury had a greater impact on occupational therapy than on physical therapy utilization. CONCLUSIONS: The use of physical therapy and occupational therapy is much higher in Germans with spinal cord injury than in the general population and in people with similar neurological conditions. Further research should focus on the frequency of use and the types of interventions. Guidelines for lifelong care should include recommendations on physical therapy and occupational therapy.

[Spinal Cord Injury in Germany - a Survey on the Living and Care Situation of People with Spinal Cord Injury]. / Querschnittlähmung in Deutschland ­ eine Befragung zur Lebens- und Versorgungssituation von Menschen mit Querschnittlähmung.

PURPOSE: Multiple organizations like UN and WHO call for the collection of internationally comparable data on living and supply conditions of people with disabilities. Furthermore, reliable national data are necessary for ensuring appropriate care. Regarding patients with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) in Germany, only data on diagnostics or therapeutic interventions is currently available. The International Spinal Cord Injury Survey aims at collecting reliable data of people with SCI in 21 countries and developing recommendations for actions to be taken by policy-makers and other decision-makers. METHODS: In 2017, eight specialized SCI-centers across Germany sent a standardized questionnaire to their patients who had diagnosis of SCI, and were older than 18 years (n=5,598). The questionnaire could be completed paper-based or online. RESULTS: 1,479 patients participated in the study and were included in data analysis. On average, participants were 55.3 years (SD=14.6) old, ¾ were male. The mean time of onset of paralysis was 13.9 years. Two thirds of the spinal cord injury causes were traumatic. In 51.2% SCI was classified as paraplegia. The most frequently cited health problem was sexual dysfunction. Medical treatment for this problem was rarely used. Serious environmental barriers were the inadequate accessibility of private households and public places. 42.5% of the respondents in working age were employed, which is 10% less than in Switzerland. DISCUSSION: Serious problems in environmental barriers, medical care and labor market participation were identified for people with SCI. The results will be reported to and discussed with political decision makers and further actors to create solutions. This requires extensive efforts, like modification in building law and home support.

[Factors Influencing Access to Follow-Up Rehabilitation]. / Einflussfaktoren auf den Zugang in die Anschlussrehabilitation (AR/AHB).

PURPOSE: Identification of patient-related influencing factors on access to follow-up rehabilitation METHODS: Partially standardized, written survey of patients between the ages of 18 and 65 in 3 acute hospitals in Hanover, who were assigned to one of the following six defined indication groups on the basis of their diagnosis: (1) surgically treated bone fractures, (2) knee and hip endoprosthesis, (3) malignant disease from visceral surgery, (4) heart disease without surgical intervention, (5) heart disease with surgical intervention, and (6) stroke. In addition to personal information (such as age and gender) personal rehabilitation goals, rehabilitation motivation, disease processing, functioning, state of health, the knowledge of right to request and suffrage and the personal desire to start a follow-up rehabilitation were raised. RESULTS: Of the 1,227 patients surveyed, 42.5% received follow-up rehabilitation. The percentages between the groups of diagnoses varied widely and were lowest after conservatively treated heart disease (3.2%) and highest after knee and hip joint replacement (98.1%). Including cases with a follow-up rehabilitation relevant diagnosis (n=1,000), the proportion of persons with rehabilitation increased to 51.7% (p<0.001). Reasons for an untreated follow-up rehabilitation were in rare cases the rejection by the payer (0.7%), the rejection by the patient (1.6%) or the lack of rehabilitation ability (3.3%). However in most cases the application remained without further differentiation (28.5%). The most important factor influencing follow-up rehabilitation access were diagnosis. Compared to knee- and hip endoprosthesis, the patients from other relevant diagnosis groups had a much lower chance to start a follow-up rehabilitation (OR from 0,01 up to 0,07; p<0,001). The desire of the patient showed the second most and significant influence to get follow-up rehabilitation (OR=8.18; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis was identified as the most important criterion for follow-up rehabilitation access. No measurable factors of functioning seem to have a big influence. Therefore, the individual doctor's decision to submit an application is of particular importance. Especially because of the low level of medical knowledge on the indication catalog of the German pension insurance, the medical treatment based on professional experience as well as the lack of further education possibilities (Gottschling-Lang, 2016), it can be assumed that the follow-up rehabilitation is less standardized and systematic. In order to ensure a need-based patient care, assessment procedures should be established and the training and continuing education of physicians should be supplemented with the topic of follow-up rehabilitation.